Quote:
|
Originally Posted by janebert if you will scratch the surface with differences in language
Jane |
Assuming that was aimed at me, since I pointed out the difference in common usage....(whilst vs. while).
What's interesting is that you seem to assume I was
also saying...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by janebert as though your language is somehow more clever, |
Whilst I was obviously being a bit "cute"--not to mention off topic (mea culpa)--I don't get where you could validly infer an assertion of chauvinism from my statement.
Was I poking fun at what to my primitive 'Mercan ear sounded a bit quaint? OK, I was.
But my comment--at least to my mind, as I was making it--was not so much poking fun, as it was an observation that I think holds true:
It would be difficult for an American to try to write for your audience.
A point you seem to agree with...
Quote:
|
Only to the degree that the Yank didn't know how to write properly. "While" and "whilst" are both used in proper english - it just depends on the context. They are not mutually exclusive, or used in one dialect and not the other. It's just a question of using the appropriate form at the appropriate time.
|
In fact "whilst" is almost never used in the States. I can't remember any of my philosophy professors in college using it. Even when we were discussing Whitehead or the British Empiricists. (of course it was a land grant college.)
Any copywriter who used "whilst" for an American audience had better know exactly what he was doing, because in almost every case, it would sound affected. My 1968 Random House Dictionary identifies it as "
Chiefly Brit."
So the Yank would likely
not "know how to write properly" unless his ear were trained for British usage.
(Having watched "A Fish Called Wanda" several times, I consider myself an expert on this topic.)
Or you can go here to get a great perspective on American vs. British usages:
http://www.worldwidewords.org/index.htm