Barry, I Agree With You. In Most Cases, Long, Long Headlines Are...
...Headlines That Suck!
For Us Copywriters,
Discipline And Creativity Go Hand-In-Hand
This is a post in response to
Headlines That Suck, a January 15th 2007 blog entry by
Barry A. Densa.
Yes, I have seen a number of Internet Marketing-related sales pages that have headlines that can almost stand alone as a full paragraph. Is it even possible to read these headlines aloud without stoping to take a deep breath? Obviously, whoever wrote these headlines didn't read their copy aloud, or their excitment blinded them to the fact that the people who'll be reading it aren't excited.
I'm not sure if the same trend is creeping into other industries, but I would not be surprised if it is.
Again, as you said in your blog entry, headlines that are really paragraphs have so many words that their essential message becomes diluted--drowned in a sea of words before the would-be curious reader even reads past the headline.
But I was wondering, Barry, what's your opinion on pre-heads and post-heads?
You can see that I've used those 2 devices here.
In your post, you said that the only singular purpose of a headline is to get the reader to read what's right underneath it.
True, but I would also add that there are a number of mechanics, or sub-purposes, that make up that singular purpose:
1. Get attention
2. Select the target audience while excluding all others (who wouldn't be good for the offer anyway)
3. "Show a little leg," as you said in your post.
This Is Where The Challenge Is, And This Is The Difference Between A...
Screaming, Me-Too "Copywriter" And A Creative, Principled Copywriter
I think the biggest difference between these 2 types of copywriter (only one of which is the true, hypeless type) can be seen in their headlines. The me-too type copy screams by using a lot of words, whereas the creative one can communicate exactly the same message (or at least create intrigue, which causes further readership) in much fewer words.
Of course, the reason why there's been a surge of me-too, can't-stop-to-take-a-breath headlines is that there's a lot of copycats out there who lack principled creativity. They see what eveyone else is doing (putting out diluted copy or mindlessly using overused headline templates) and uncreatively follow the pack.
Some of these guys are disciplined. They're disciplined in the sense that they stricly adhere to the copywriting rules and templates that they were taught. But discipline, in my opinion, should not be adhered to point that creativity suffers.
After all, the copywriting pioneers of ages past had to be creative enough to create the copywriting templates we abide by today. How do we know that they didn't create all of them?
How do we know that there aren't undiscovered headline templates that would appeal well to certain niche markets?
These are the questions a principled/disciplined, yet creative copywriter asks herself.
This type of copywriter is principled/disciplined in the sense that they understand the principles of human psychology, and abide by those unchanging principles.
Hence the discipline.
On the other side of the coin, this type of copywriter is also creative in the sense that, while abiding by the unchanging principles of human nature, the creative copywriter channels and molds those principles in ways that haven't been done before.
Hence the creativity.
I hope this stimulates meaningful thought.
Do you agree with me?
Is there something I overlooked?