Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Alakazam Jane -
The problem (as I understand it -- no direct experience with this) is that if you aim to please your client and their clients with appearance/tone, you may end up with something that looks great but doesn't convert traffic.
If my target market buys more widgets with an approach I hate (assuming it's still ethical), isnt it in my best interest to grit my teeth and bear it -- all the way to the bank?
I think you can build a long-term relationship with a "scream in your face" sales letter. After all, if your product solved their problem and you have a good follow-up after the sale, won't they be happy customers no matter what the web site looks like? (That's not a vote for ugliness, though.)
Thanks for the debate -- you guys have entertained me *and* educated me. =
Jay Jennings
jayATjayjenningsD0Tcom |
That's damned brilliant and I'm not kidding, Jay.
No, there's absolutely nothing about a sales page that's intrinsically contrary to a long term, positive, productive, satisfying relationship with a customer - from both sides.
Everything that Michel and some others stand by has better than 100 years of history behind it and is recently, almost daily validated.
Most of the 'players' in marketing, the big ones, are in it for the long haul. They aren't stupid people. They know what works to move product, minimize returns and establish a rep for delivering quality to their markets.
"You are not your market".
An example of what I'm talking about is the Rohletters business, More, Inc. They sell in excess of a million dollars a year in get rich quick information. Some of their customers have been with them for over ten years. Some outsiders think very little of them for the product they put out, but their market loves them. If not, they get their money back. Their price points range from around $20.00 to over $8,000.00.
We're not talking a few thousand dollars in this business of direct response or, more specifically, Web response. People don't generally succeed by accident. The direct response industry topped two Trillion dollars last year and it is projected that it will grow at a rate of 9% through 2004. That includes infomercials, direct mail etc. and the figure comes from the Direct Marketing Association.
My business partner and I have a bunch of Web sites. I don't make that number or our URL's public. Six of those sites are used for testing.
This is not a business of logic. It's a business built on what works, not what makes sense. It's built on what the market does and not on what the market says it will do. It's built on results. It's built on testing. It's built on small moves - tweaking more so than on radical shifts of paradigm. It's built on following the money. It's built by imitating genius rather than inventing mediocrity to paraphrase. This business comes to us from generations and generations ago.
I started selling in my teens, over 30 years ago. A turning point for me was when I sold fire extinguishers later in my sales career, door-to-door. The demonstration was this. I would walk in with a catalog case - pregnant briefcase. I would pull out a frying pan, a can of lighter fluid and a box of wooden matches. I would remove one match from the box, hand the box and the match to the prospect and while I was talking, squirt lighter fluid in the pan. It just took a few seconds. Then, I would tell the customer to light the match and throw it in the pan. They would. Then I would just tap the button on the fire extinguisher and the fire was out. Demo over and time for the pitch.
Now, does any of that make so much as a modicum of common sense to anybody? First, they would let me, a total stranger in their house. Then they would follow my direction to throw a match in the pan knowing fully that if they did that, there would be an open fire in the middle of their living room floor.
Do you think that if I interviewed any of those prospects or if I acted on reason I would have ever made a sale? No. If I had acted in accordance with what the market would have reported, I wouldn't have taken the job. Let's see what a survey might look like.
Would you, under any circumstances, let a total stranger into your home?
How about a stranger carrying a big case?
What would you do if there were a stranger in your living room who told you it was ok to have an open fire in a frying pan, on the floor? And that you should light a match to start that fire, so it was totally under your control - would you follow that stranger's instruction? Would you then give him your credit card?
You know where this is going. You know they bought. You know it isn't logical. But it worked.
Peter Stone