Let's start by saying it isn't that bad. The Q & A device to introduce your "elevator pitch" is not bad.
Take the elevator pitch itself:
"I have a proven reputation for designing websites for small businesses and taking them to the top-end of the major search engines, while producing affordable effective website designs that the small business owner will really benefit from."
- proven reputation ...claim without proof
- top-end of the major search engines ...pseudo promise that sounds good without guarantee or any specific result
- affordable effective ...no context
People like to say they cut to the point. What's the point of making unsubstantiated claims similar to every single web design firm out there? Is there any competitor who, for instance, boast they drop your site right to the bottom of SERPs?
It seems like the copy is saying something, but everything here is what I call "sweet nothings." Getting to the top end of search engines could mean the top 400,000 results for a popular term. It sounds good but promises exactly nothing.
What's worse is I can't distinguish any difference between Eazy Site, Eazy Brochure, or even Eazy Commerce. Really, they're the same things stated three different ways. Just on the basis of information value, the descriptions don't tell the reader a single thing.
What would actually get to the point? Change your generic boilerplate elevator pitch to a unique selling proposition. Offer a guarantee which stands behind your claim. Instead of sweet nothings, actually do
get to the point. Explain some benefits. Develop some differentiation.
One way to do that is with a side-by-side checklist. The
checklist for Basecamp actually cuts out the nonsense and gets to the point.
Dump the pointless thumbnails with cute animated effects. Develop
detailed case histories which explain your designs are "effective." Don't just throw the word effective into a boilerplate sentence -- prove it.
It's all well and good to say you get to the point. This site doesn't. Customers want to know what differentiates you from competitors, this site serves up the same trite boilerplate you could find in any template. That's not a USP, or differentiation -- that's camouflage.
When you can buy a template at from $25 to zero you'll have to do a lot better.