Hey Ken,
Good to see you around again. You asked for comments... Here
goes.
Pardon the typos, I'm doing this on the fly.
I think you need to make a decision what you're really selling
here. Are you selling Ken? Are you projecting your success onto
the lives of your attendees?
Or are you selling your techniques and strategies... the very
path you walked to get to success?
Or are you really selling something else? Something never
offered before?
With what you've got now in the letter, you are offering a series
of proven proprietary strategies (everyone is) for nearly every
type of trader (like everyone else).
Right now, you've got a little something for everyone. So much
so, that it's a huge challenge to get your reader to jump out of
his chair and say, "Ken's talking to ME!!!"
You're up against a big challenge in terms of differentiation.
Especially if you want your positioning to be strong like you
mention.
I think it's just too much noise to cut through when you are
being that general.
What can your people accomplish because of what you do? That
ONLY you do?
In your letter, you're giving them "Reasons to Attend." That's a
pretty needy position. Who needs who here? You've got the gold
right?
As for the tone of the letter...
It kind of goes back and forth between Ken talking and talking
ABOUT Ken (like in the promo video). That's a lot of shifting
and I think it takes away from the bond you are building with
your reader.
Plus, I don't think you'd talk this way if you were selling this
to your long-time golf partner. You wouldn't "sell" him. You'd
say things like, "Chuck, if you do one thing this year to get
yourself on a success track, this seminar should be it. By the
time you leave, in just 48 hours, here's what you are going to
fully prepared to accomplish... And I'm going to make sure
you're ready."
I get to the end of your letter and I'm really not sure why I
should come... except that it's cheap. And obviously you've got
a good track record. But still, a trip across the country? At
least I'm not sure how I would condense it into a one sentence
fragment to convince my wife that it was time well spent. Time
away from kids and family.
What about a different approach... Go back to your "immersion"
idea. That's the reason they need to be there... All the facts
about modeling, etc. that you can use for credibility.
That way, you're selling a new take on a proven learning
technique... IMMERSION, OSMOSIS, whatever you want to call it,
and it doesn't come across that you're selling Ken or your
trading strategies.
Also...
I've known of you for long enough to know that you're the real
deal... And you've got some attitude to throw around when you
think it's appropriate.
Where is that? Where's the REAL Ken?
Good luck!