You have my sympathy. What you want is a stunning before and after graphic -- not just copy. The internet is notoriously lacking in credibility. Internet wrinkle cures are just asking for trouble.
The copy that is there is discouraging. Some of the bullets are okay, but mostly it lacks belief structure. Worse yet, it takes forever to get to the point.
Quote:
While many women judge other women based on her dress size-hair style-or clothing, most men judge a woman based on how youthful and pretty (underline those two words) she looks.
....Women with a more youthful appearance usually have the most friends, have a better outlook on life, and therefore feel better about themselves (much more so than those who look worn out and tired).
It just doesn’t seem fair, does it?
|
What is your point? This is trite. It also sounds like you pulled this factoid out of your ....hat. Then you shoot yourself in both feet with "To tell you the truth, I’m very confused with all the products on the shelves… Sometimes a product is raved about one year, then “scientific research” reveals something else is better." This can also apply to your own product. It inserts doubt, then just leaves it out there. I just kept saying to myself "So What" so many times at every single point in the copy.
Let's take a look at some other copy.
Quote:
Science has never disputed facial muscles' ability to build. It has the same muscle fiber and connective tissue as the rest of the body. So, what's the problem? Resistance training for the body has been well established for years, but for some reason we just can't get past the neck. Is the public still holding out for that miracle in a jar? You know, like thigh cream.
I began teaching facial fitness in the late 1970's. At that time, facial isometrics was the only known form of facial training with much of the public considering it risky at best. By 1978, I became interested in weightlifting. Not long after entering the gym, I decided to step into competitive bodybuilding. This move called for a marked reduction in body fat that consequently had an aging effect on my face. This was not an acceptable trade-off. However, if I were to continue training to compete, increasing my weight would not be an option.
Considering the fact resistance training allows the body a lower percentage of fat without looking too thin, I wondered what effect, if any, resistance training would have on my face. I must admit, I was a little nervous at the thought of trying resistance training on my face but I certainly wasn't happy with the way my face was beginning to look. With no plans to give up the sport I decided it was worth a shot. So, I converted each facial isometric exercise over to resistance… BINGO! I found the facial muscles' to be every bit as responsive to resistance training as any other body part. The result of this training was even better than I had hoped. The increase in muscle size created an even greater lift. My face was still thin, but with the extra firmness, I no longer looked gaunt.
It became quite obvious to me that isometrics (toning exercises) only scratched the surface. We just weren't taking it far enough. Most people will find after a certain age that tone is not enough, especially when making up for the loss of fat in the subcutaneous layer. For this reason alone you need an increase in muscle size.
Today, many studies are documenting the effect of resistance training on the face. A study conducted by Eureka Physical Therapy in Eureka, CA and myself, resulted in an average of 35% increase in facial muscle strength over a two week period. At the Skin Study Center in Broomall, PA a similar study (Facial Flex) showed a 250% increase in strength over an eight week period with a 32% increase in skin elasticity.
Some might ask, what does facial muscle strength have to do with lifting and firming the face? Ask yourself this; when you increase the strength of your biceps, what other changes take place? Remember, resistance training demands a muscle's full potential, an increase in size. Facial muscles' are no exception. To think otherwise is just plain lazy thinking. Facialbuilding, bodybuilding, the result is exactly the same.
--FlexEffect site
|
Unfortunately it doesn't close the deal, but this is a fair opener that
gets to the point. Everything is related back to wrinkle reduction. It's not rambling all over the place. Let's examine this more closely...
....Science has never disputed
.... began teaching facial fitness in the late 1970's.
....Considering the fact
....many studies are documenting the effect of resistance training on the face.
Belief structure built in the first sentence of every paragraph -- textbook Eugene Schwartz. Then we get "Some might ask, what does facial muscle strength have to do with lifting and firming the face?" Which brings up a likely objection --
then answers the objection in the same paragraph. At no point is there doubt about the writer's belief in the product. The writer is raising and resolving your doubt as the reader.
You can say "I know what you're thinking, and I had the same concerns." But you have to then turn it back into walking the reader though the process of resolving the concern. You must go from I to "you" immediately and stay on "you."
The case is built piece by piece. And you get the idea that this could work to reduce wrinkles. Exactly what I didn't get from your copy.
Want to know what your graphics guy should be showing people?? I have a mockup on a site I did just to give you an idea --
check it out. (scroll down to the before and after photo).
Can't get those results? Then by all means don't make claims your product can't produce. But know one thing -- that's what is going to get your customers to buy.
You should now be hitting that little green button next to my name like a lab rat trying to get a fix of morphine.