Jane, you can be my attorney any day! You have the gift!
Peter, jump back in buddy, no hard feelings. Your points
are heard here.
Everybody,
I really like Tim's emphasis on overdelivery. Exceeding
expectations seems like a very smart strategy.
How might we apply this overdelivery concept to the sales
copy side of the equation? That's what I'm reaching for.
How can I as a writer escape the formula available
on a million other pages, so that my readers are surprised
and delighted, and thus actually read my copy?
What would my readers consider copy overdelivery?
I could stay within the persuasion paradigm and tinker with
the words to test out various versions of hard sell and soft
sell. OK, that's an option.
Is tinkering with the wording enough, or do I have to change
the mindset behind my wording in order to jog the reader
out of their habitual, conditioned, long practised reaction
to anything they see as falling in to the "sales pitch" box
in their mind?
Can I exceed expectations from within the persuasion point
of view?
Interesting irony crossed my mind this morning.
My no-sell strategy thread does seem pretty theorhetical
even hopelessly idealistic, as I describe it, I must admit.
Then I pondered the way Mike is hosting this forum, and
the effect it is having on me. Obviously Mike created
this forum to build his business, we all understand that.
Look at the way he is building his business in this space.
His posts are information heavy and opinion lite. He is
honest enough as a writer to be interesting, but always
respectful.
And there is NO pitch involved at all. None. A point of
view expressed, yes. Attempts to persuade us to buy
something, no.
Mike isn't thinking of his forum members as cattle that have
to be cleverly hearded down the sales funnel. He is not
writing to us from that point of view, thus there is no need
for him to use an intricate formula to carefully weigh the
exact tactical consequences of each word.
He's just being himself naturally, and we are reacting
favorably to a genuine fellow human being.
If we want to acheive a unique voice that doesn't generate
resistance we might consider doing as Mike does, not what he
says, and doing what Phil says, but NOT what he does!
Phil